In many countries, young people are finding it harder and harder to find permanent jobs. Why is this? What can be done to improve this situation?
In recent years, there has been an astronomical upsurge in the number of companies offering secondment opportunities to young people instead of permanent jobs, giving rise to a wide range of problems in people’s life. There are a variety of factors that account for this. This essay will present an overview of these factors and suggest potential solutions.
To begin with, permanent jobs offer a colossal amount of risk to companies. One of the primary reasons to hire casual manpower is that they are contracted by a third party agency and a firm bears lower burden of managing people. Moreover, companies will always hire diligent workers and outperformers who work collectively towards their assigned duties. It becomes easier for companies to discontinue services of incompetent workers, as they are not under any obligation with the employee. By offering higher salary to temporary staff, the companies do not have to worry about granting any (earned, sick) leaves and in return employees will commit more number of work hours in order to avoid the risk of getting underpaid.
However, apropos of the statement there are some pertinent solutions in accord with permanent jobs. In this highly competitive job market, the companies should scrutinize their employment process to appoint the right candidate matching the job description. Furthermore, by removing the channel of recruitment agencies, the companies will save enormous time and money, which can be invested in the upliftment of the firm. Ultimately, this process will offer a peace of mind to everyone.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the role a company plays in the employment process is instrumental because not only do permanent jobs offer a direction to young learners, but also helps them work collectively towards the organisational goals.
Mass tourism has a negative effect on a country and should be discouraged. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Provide examples and supporting evidence to back up your opinion on this subject.
In recent decades, travelling overseas to experience new cultures and places has been a norm. While excessive tourism has the potential to cause pollution in the surrounding habitat, I believe the resulting outcomes on the nation’s economy outweigh the downside.
Firstly, extensive tourism can cause harm to the country’s environment. This is because uprising demand for food, water, and energy by the travellers forces the country to supply enormous amount of resources at the expense of the environment. Therefore, a probable resource deficit might drive the government to build more dams and burn more fuel to meet the demand, resulting in deforestation and poor air quality. For example, Khaosan Road, a popular street in Thailand, is congested with high volume of foreigners, leading to huge amount of waste being discarded on the street every day. Ultimately, the widespread of tourism encourages pollution and destroys the nation’s point of interest which made it attractive in the first place.
Contrastingly, the influx of visitors can bring positive effects to the country’s economic health. Often, foreigners on a holiday are willing to spend on local products for themselves and their loved ones. In the Third World countries, tourists are subjected to higher prices when purchasing goods. However, many travellers are not bothered to bargain due to high currency exchange rates. This in turns drives the local economy, creating more jobs that will have prosperous ripple effects towards the natives. For instance, business owners selling hand-made cultural souvenirs can preserve their culture and way of life whilst receiving a handsome income. So, the economy is propelled in a progressive direction.
In brief, notwithstanding the fact that excessive tourism has adverse effects on the country’s environment, as far as I’m concerned, a healthy economy driven by the vacation industry is far more beneficial to a nation.
The growth in international travel means that misunderstandings between countries will inevitably decrease. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Travel involves not only visiting a new place, but also exploring and experiencing the food, culture and lifestyle. Nowadays, overseas travel has become safe, easy and convenient than what it used to be in past centuries. I agree that there are more advantages when people travel overseas as it unlocks any misapprehension that they previously d had and improves economy of the host country.
Mostly, everyone likes to travel as it provides an opportunity to learn about different cultures, values, experience different cuisines and acquire knowledge about history of other places. People can come to know about different lifestyles and also learn different languages. Tourism enhances financial and economic growth of the nation. Various political and other sensitive issues can be sorted between different countries.
The above-mentioned positive facts will help to ease any misunderstandings which people and nations might have. But, there are certain negative factors which can arise with international travel. Sometimes, people tend to forget to respect different values and cultures. Foreigners are often targeted as people have many wrong opinions about them. Cleanliness and safety becomes a serious issue when people don’t follow the civic and traffic rules and guidelines. Problems such as pollution, environmental damage and drug trafficking impose a threat to the nation.
In conclusion, international travel widens people’s perspective and provides more knowledge about various things. It provides an opportunity to come closer and share different values, food and cultures. At the same time, certain measures should be taken by government to eliminate and control the negative aspect while safeguarding the interests of people and the nation.